Radeon R9 M275X vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRage 4Venus
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)28 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Compute unitsno data10
Core clock speed90 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors8 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.3637.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed90 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.0 MB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.4
OpenCLN/ANot Listed
VulkanN/A-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 28 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

R9 M275X has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PCI and Radeon R9 M275X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M275X is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Radeon R9 M275X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PCI or Radeon R9 M275X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.