Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon E6760

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E6760 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

Radeon E6760
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.27

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon E6760 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking816501
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.22no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTurksTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data
Current price$90 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48080
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40no data
Floating-point performance576.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon E6760 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−260%
18
+260%
1440p3−4
−233%
10
+233%
4K4−5
−275%
15
+275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−221%
45−50
+221%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−216%
60−65
+216%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hitman 3 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
−213%
100−105
+213%
Metro Exodus 38
−216%
120−130
+216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−217%
95−100
+217%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
−213%
50−55
+213%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hitman 3 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Metro Exodus 25
−220%
80−85
+220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
−213%
75−80
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−218%
70−75
+218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
−227%
160−170
+227%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−225%
65−70
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−228%
95−100
+228%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Hitman 3 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%

This is how Radeon E6760 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 260% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 233% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 275% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 7.45
Recency 2 May 2011 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E6760 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 819 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.