Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon E6760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E6760 HD 6510 HD 6570 HD 6570 OEM HD 6670 HD 7510 OEM HD 7570 HD 7670 OEM HD 8510 OEM HD 8550 OEM HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E6760 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Radeon E6760
2011, $240
1 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.02

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms E6760 by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking922494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency3.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTurksMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2011 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4804
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.40no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012_2
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−400%
25
+400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p48.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Radeon E6760 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.02 9.42
Recency 2 May 2011 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 366.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E6760 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E6760 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
R7 M520 Radeon R7 M520
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
8600 GT 8600 GT
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
GeForce4 MX 420 PCI 420 PCI
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
UHD Graphics G7 G7
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
Jetson TX1 GPU TX1 GPU
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile
HD 6490M Mac Edition AMD HD 6490M Mac Edition
vs
FX 500 500
HD 6490M Mac Edition AMD HD 6490M Mac Edition
vs
Graphics Graphics
HD 6490M Mac Edition AMD HD 6490M Mac Edition
vs
RX 6600 XT 6600 XT
HD 6490M Mac Edition AMD HD 6490M Mac Edition
vs
HD 7410M 7410M
HD 6490M Mac Edition AMD HD 6490M Mac Edition
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER 4070 SUPER

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E6760 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.