GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon E6760

Place in performance ranking	816	253
Place by popularity	not in top-100	2
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.22	18.87
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Turks	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 May 2011 (13 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$239.99	$149
Current price	$90 (0.4x MSRP)	$185 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 has 8477% better value for money than Radeon E6760.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	896
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.40	93.24
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E6760 2.27

GTX 1650 20.40
+799%

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon E6760 by 799% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon E6760 876

GTX 1650 7876
+799%

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon E6760 by 799% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −886%	69 +886%
1440p	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
4K	2−3 −1000%	22 +1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−967%

30−35
+967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −960%	53 +960%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −840%	47 +840%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −888%	79 +888%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −940%	52 +940%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −814%	64 +814%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −900%	80 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −800%	90 +800%
Hitman 3	5−6 −880%	49 +880%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −858%	115 +858%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −910%	101 +910%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −863%	77 +863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −840%	94 +840%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −833%	56 +833%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −840%	47 +840%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −800%	72 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −940%	52 +940%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −833%	56 +833%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −857%	201 +857%
Hitman 3	4−5 −850%	38 +850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −863%	260 +863%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −829%	65 +829%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −800%	63 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −825%	74 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −825%	74 +825%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −881%	206 +881%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1150%	25 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	8
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −829%	65 +829%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −900%	60 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −933%	62 +933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −950%	21 +950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−800%

+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −900%	50 +900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
Hitman 3	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −975%	43 +975%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −925%	41 +925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −800%	45 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1067%

35
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −900%	20 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1200%	26 +1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1050%	23 +1050%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −950%	21 +950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1600%

17
+1600%

This is how Radeon E6760 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 is 886% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 is 825% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 is 1000% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.27	20.40
Recency	2 May 2011	23 April 2019
Cost	$239.99	$149
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	75 Watt