FirePro M4150 vs ATI Radeon E4690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E4690 with FirePro M4150, including specs and performance data.

ATI E4690
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.97

M4150 outperforms E4690 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1166880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.49no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV730Opal
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2009 (16 years ago)16 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed600 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors514 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.2017.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.01.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI E4690 0.97
FirePro M4150 2.48
+156%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI E4690 405
Samples: 3
FirePro M4150 1038
+156%
Samples: 69

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 2.48
Recency 1 June 2009 16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

FirePro M4150 has a 156% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon E4690 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E4690 or FirePro M4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.