Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI 9600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9600 and Radeon RX 6950 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI 9600
2003
64 MB DDR, 12 Watt
0.09

RX 6950 XT outperforms ATI 9600 by a whopping 77567% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking145917
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.25
Power efficiency0.5415.05
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV350Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (21 year ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed324 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2324 MHz
Number of transistors60 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt335 Watt
Texture fill rate1.296743.7
Floating-point processing powerno data23.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed189 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.048 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9600 0.09
RX 6950 XT 69.90
+77567%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9600 35
RX 6950 XT 28151
+80331%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1221
1440p-0−1134
4K-0−185

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.97
1440pno data8.20
4Kno data12.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 204
+0%
204
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 161
+0%
161
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 198
+0%
198
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 500
+0%
500
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 168
+0%
168
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Dota 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 442
+0%
442
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 167
+0%
167
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 396
+0%
396
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 153
+0%
153
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+0%
294
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 132
+0%
132
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 77
+0%
77
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 172
+0%
172
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 69.90
Recency 1 October 2003 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 335 Watt

ATI 9600 has 2691.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, has a 77566.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600
Radeon 9600
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 128 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2765 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.