Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs ATI Radeon 9600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9600 PRO and Iris Xe Graphics MAX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI 9600 PRO
2003
128 MB DDR, 18 Watt
0.11

Iris Xe Graphics MAX outperforms ATI 9600 PRO by a whopping 4545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1443621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV350DG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (21 year ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60079.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9600 PRO 0.11
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 5.11
+4545%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9600 PRO 42
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1971
+4593%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 5.11
Recency 1 October 2003 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

ATI 9600 PRO has 38.9% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has a 4545.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 72 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 208 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.