UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs ATI Radeon 9500

#ad 
Buy
All-In-Wonder 9500 All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO Radeon 9500 Radeon 9500 PRO Radeon 9600 TX Radeon 9700 Radeon 9700 PRO Radeon 9700 PRO X4
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9500 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9500
2003
64 MB DDR, 12 Watt
0.08

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms ATI 9500 by a whopping 4813% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1469669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5311.13
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameR300Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed275 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors110 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed270 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12_1
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−117

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.08 3.93
Recency 1 March 2003 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

ATI 9500 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has a 4812.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9500 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
vs
ATI 9550 Radeon 9550
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Iris Plus Graphics 650
ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
vs
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
ATI X800 XL ATI X800 XL
vs
6600 GT Dual 6600 GT Dual
ATI X300 Radeon X300
vs
ATI 9500 9500
ATI X300 SE ATI X300 SE
vs
ATI 9500 PRO 9500 PRO
ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
vs
RTX 5070 Ti 5070 Ti
ATI 9800 XT Radeon 9800 XT
vs
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
ATI 9800 Radeon 9800
vs
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
ATI 9500 PRO Radeon 9500 PRO
vs
RTX 4060 Ti 4060 Ti
ATI 8500 Radeon 8500
vs
NVS 280 PCI 280 PCI
ATI 7000 Radeon 7000
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
ATI 7200 64 MB Radeon 7200 64 MB
vs
RTX 5070 Ti 5070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 511 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9500 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.