FirePro W6150M vs ATI Radeon 9500

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9500 with FirePro W6150M, including specs and performance data.

ATI 9500
2003
64 MB DDR, 12 Watt
0.09

W6150M outperforms ATI 9500 by a whopping 6711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1464594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.51no data
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameR300Saturn
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)12 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed275 MHz1075 MHz
Number of transistors110 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.10051.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.28 GB/s88 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 9500 0.09
W6150M 6.13
+6711%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9500 36
W6150M 2358
+6450%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 6.13
Recency 1 March 2003 12 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

W6150M has a 6711.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W6150M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9500 is a desktop card while FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9500
Radeon 9500
AMD FirePro W6150M
FirePro W6150M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9500 or FirePro W6150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.