ATI FireGL 8800 vs ATI Radeon 9250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1525not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameRV280R200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2004 (20 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed240 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors36 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.962.400
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz290 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s9.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.18.1
OpenGL1.41.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2004 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB

ATI 9250 has an age advantage of 2 years.

ATI FireGL 8800, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9250 and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9250 is a desktop card while FireGL 8800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250
ATI FireGL 8800
FireGL 8800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 52 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.