P104-100 vs ATI Radeon 9200

Place in the ranking	1522	472
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.02	no data
Architecture	Rage 7 (2001−2006)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	RV280	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)	12 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	1920
Core clock speed	250 MHz	1607 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1733 MHz
Number of transistors	36 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	1.000	208.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.655 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	4	120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	320.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	1.4	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI 9200 0.01

P104-100 9.38
+93700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9200 3

P104-100 3612
+120300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	9.38
Recency	1 May 2003	12 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	16 nm

P104-100 has a 93700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

The P104-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 is a desktop card while P104-100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.