GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1574not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.03no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR200G94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2003 (23 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed250 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors60 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.42.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2003 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 75 Watt

ATI 9100 has 168% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9100 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9100 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9100 or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.