ATI Radeon 9100 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI with Radeon 9100, including specs and performance data.

9800M GT SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.89
+18800%

9800M SLI outperforms 9100 by a whopping 18800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9541574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.120.03
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNB9E-GT2R200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed500 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX108.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 0.01
Recency 15 July 2008 1 April 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

9800M GT SLI has a 18800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9100, on the other hand, has 364% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GT SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9100 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT SLI or Radeon 9100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.