GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB vs ATI Radeon 9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 9000 and GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI 9000
2002
64 MB DDR, 28 Watt
0.01

RTX 3080 12 GB outperforms ATI 9000 by a whopping 676400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking151728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.08
Power efficiency0.0313.57
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV250GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)11 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8960
Core clock speed250 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors36 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000478.8
Floating-point processing powerno data30.64 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s912.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI 9000 0.01
RTX 3080 12 GB 67.65
+676400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9000 4
RTX 3080 12 GB 26620
+665400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1182
1440p-0−1121
4K-0−182

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.39
1440pno data6.60
4Kno data9.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 248
+0%
248
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 171
+0%
171
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 171
+0%
171
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 145
+0%
145
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Dota 2 176
+0%
176
+0%
Far Cry 5 162
+0%
162
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 147
+0%
147
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 321
+0%
321
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140
+0%
140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Dota 2 161
+0%
161
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 165
+0%
165
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130
+0%
130
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 67.65
Recency 1 July 2002 11 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 350 Watt

ATI 9000 has 1150% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 676400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000
Radeon 9000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 998 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9000 or GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.