FireStream 9370 vs ATI Radeon 9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.01
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV250Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)23 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1600
Core clock speed250 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors36 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00066.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.44.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI 9000 4
FireStream 9370 2528
+63100%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 23 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 225 Watt

ATI 9000 has 703.6% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9000 and FireStream 9370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9000 is a desktop card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9000
Radeon 9000
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.