Arc B580 vs Radeon 890M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 890M with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 890M
2024
15 Watt
20.86

Arc B580 outperforms 890M by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.46
Power efficiency100.0014.50
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameStrix PointBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)13 December 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed400 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate185.6427.2
Floating-point processing power5.939 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs64160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores1620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data456.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 890M 20.86
Arc B580 38.31
+83.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 890M 8541
Arc B580 15685
+83.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 890M 15366
Arc B580 38258
+149%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 890M 44384
Arc B580 111354
+151%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 890M 9145
Arc B580 35296
+286%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 890M 54704
Arc B580 136983
+150%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 890M 472994
Arc B580 687544
+45.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−191%
125
+191%
1440p18
−278%
68
+278%
4K21−24
−100%
42
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.99
1440pno data3.66
4Kno data5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 117
−82.1%
210−220
+82.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−149%
112
+149%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
−212%
134
+212%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Counter-Strike 2 91
−134%
210−220
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−116%
97
+116%
Far Cry 5 57
−204%
173
+204%
Fortnite 100−110
−53.3%
160−170
+53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−73.8%
140−150
+73.8%
Forza Horizon 5 77
−151%
193
+151%
Hogwarts Legacy 37
−173%
101
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−86.3%
140−150
+86.3%
Valorant 150−160
−47%
220−230
+47%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Counter-Strike 2 44
−384%
210−220
+384%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−15.4%
270−280
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−82.2%
82
+82.2%
Far Cry 5 53
−202%
160
+202%
Fortnite 100−110
−53.3%
160−170
+53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−73.8%
140−150
+73.8%
Forza Horizon 5 69
−152%
174
+152%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
−155%
140
+155%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
−224%
81
+224%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−136%
106
+136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−86.3%
140−150
+86.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−354%
236
+354%
Valorant 150−160
−47%
220−230
+47%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−71.1%
77
+71.1%
Far Cry 5 50
−198%
149
+198%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−73.8%
140−150
+73.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
−263%
69
+263%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−86.3%
140−150
+86.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−158%
85
+158%
Valorant 150−160
−47%
220−230
+47%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−53.3%
160−170
+53.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−118%
95−100
+118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−75.2%
260−270
+75.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−91.7%
69
+91.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−130%
62
+130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Valorant 180−190
−34.4%
250−260
+34.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−64.4%
95−100
+64.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−180%
56
+180%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−129%
110
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−135%
54
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−100%
68
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−105%
78
+105%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−171%
46
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−171%
84
+171%
Valorant 120−130
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−146%
59
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−91.9%
70−75
+91.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−146%
32
+146%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−123%
45−50
+123%

This is how Radeon 890M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 191% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 278% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 384% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc B580 surpassed Radeon 890M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.86 38.31
Recency 15 July 2024 13 December 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 190 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1166.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 83.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 890M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 890M is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 181 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 656 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 890M or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.