Radeon RX 9060 XT vs 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 880M with Radeon RX 9060 XT, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 880M
2024
15 Watt
19.09

RX 9060 XT outperforms 880M by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency91.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameStrix PointNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)18 May 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed400 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz3230 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2413.4
Floating-point processing power4.454 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Cores1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 880M 19.09
RX 9060 XT 43.47
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 880M 7701
RX 9060 XT 17540
+128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−122%
80−85
+122%
1440p22
−127%
50−55
+127%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95
−121%
210−220
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−118%
170−180
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 70
−114%
150−160
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Far Cry 5 54
−122%
120−130
+122%
Fortnite 100−105
−120%
220−230
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−121%
170−180
+121%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−120%
130−140
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−125%
160−170
+125%
Valorant 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−118%
170−180
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−118%
85−90
+118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−118%
500−550
+118%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Far Cry 5 49
−124%
110−120
+124%
Fortnite 100−105
−120%
220−230
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−121%
170−180
+121%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−120%
130−140
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
−122%
120−130
+122%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−125%
160−170
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−126%
120−130
+126%
Valorant 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−118%
170−180
+118%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Far Cry 5 46
−117%
100−105
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−121%
170−180
+121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−125%
160−170
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−127%
75−80
+127%
Valorant 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
−120%
220−230
+120%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−118%
85−90
+118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−121%
300−310
+121%
Grand Theft Auto V 22
−127%
50−55
+127%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−105%
350−400
+105%
Valorant 170−180
−125%
400−450
+125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−126%
120−130
+126%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−126%
95−100
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−121%
95−100
+121%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−121%
75−80
+121%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Valorant 100−110
−126%
240−250
+126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

This is how Radeon 880M and RX 9060 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT is 122% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT is 127% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.09 43.47
Recency 15 July 2024 18 May 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Radeon 880M has 900% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 880M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 19 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 198 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 880M or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.