Radeon Pro V340 vs 860M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Radeon Pro V340, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
11.59
+66.3%

860M outperforms Pro V340 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking431567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency56.532.18
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameStrix PointVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)26 August 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123584
Core clock speed400 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate96.00336.0
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32224
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 11.59
+66.3%
Pro V340 6.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4746
+66.4%
Pro V340 2853

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Fortnite 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Valorant 100−110
+75%
60−65
−75%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+69%
100−105
−69%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 43
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Fortnite 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 51
+70%
30−33
−70%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Valorant 100−110
+75%
60−65
−75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 40
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Valorant 60−65
+80%
35−40
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

This is how Radeon 860M and Pro V340 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is 83% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.59 6.97
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 230 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 66.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 1433.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 860M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro V340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V340 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD Radeon Pro V340
Radeon Pro V340

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon Pro V340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.