Radeon HD 7750 vs 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Radeon HD 7750, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
10.92
+183%

860M outperforms HD 7750 by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.09
Power efficiency58.625.65
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameKrackan PointCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)15 February 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speed3000 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0025.60
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 11
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 10.92
+183%
HD 7750 3.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4829
+183%
Samples: 477
HD 7750 1705
Samples: 6042

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 860M 7175
+220%
HD 7750 2240

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+200%
14−16
−200%
1440p18
+200%
6−7
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.79
1440pno data18.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Far Cry 5 50
+213%
16−18
−213%
Fortnite 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Valorant 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+205%
55−60
−205%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Far Cry 5 45
+221%
14−16
−221%
Fortnite 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+188%
16−18
−188%
Valorant 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Far Cry 5 42
+200%
14−16
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+211%
9−10
−211%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 120−130
+215%
40−45
−215%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Valorant 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

This is how Radeon 860M and HD 7750 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is 200% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 860M is 200% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.92 3.86
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 182.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 860M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 591 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon HD 7750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.