ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Radeon HD 5570, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
11.88
+898%

860M outperforms ATI HD 5570 by a whopping 898% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4351085
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency57.232.20
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameKrackan PointRedwood
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)9 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512400
Core clock speed400 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt39 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0013.00
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3220
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 11.88
+898%
ATI HD 5570 1.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4792
+900%
ATI HD 5570 479

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 860M 11680
+1040%
ATI HD 5570 1025

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 860M 24821
+534%
ATI HD 5570 3917

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p140−150
+833%
15
−833%
Full HD44
+91.3%
23
−91.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+967%
6−7
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Dead Island 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+967%
6−7
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Dead Island 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Fortnite 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Valorant 100−110
+215%
30−35
−215%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+967%
6−7
−967%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+522%
27−30
−522%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Dead Island 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Fortnite 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Grand Theft Auto V 49 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Valorant 100−110
+215%
30−35
−215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Dead Island 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+3300%
2−3
−3300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+1157%
7−8
−1157%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Valorant 120−130
+4133%
3−4
−4133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dead Island 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Valorant 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dead Island 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1

This is how Radeon 860M and ATI HD 5570 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is 833% faster in 900p
  • Radeon 860M is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 860M is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is ahead in 44 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.88 1.19
Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 39 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 898.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 860M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 304 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon HD 5570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.