ATI Radeon 7200 vs 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4511611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameKrackan PointR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed600 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate96.001
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs326
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4876
+243700%
Samples: 1441
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28no data
1440p18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 50 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 43 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 42 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 4400% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 860M and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.