Radeon Instinct MI60 vs 840M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 840M with Radeon Instinct MI60, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 840M
2024
9.18

MI60 outperforms 840M by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking517229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.13
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKrackan PointVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 June 2024 (1 year ago)18 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speedno data1200 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speed7500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,024 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 840M 9.18
Instinct MI60 27.83
+203%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 840M 3840
Samples: 410
Instinct MI60 11638
+203%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−200%
75−80
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 84
−198%
250−260
+198%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Counter-Strike 2 68
−194%
200−210
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Fortnite 55−60
−186%
160−170
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 90−95
−197%
270−280
+197%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−182%
400−450
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Fortnite 55−60
−186%
160−170
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
Grand Theft Auto V 32
−197%
95−100
+197%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Valorant 90−95
−197%
270−280
+197%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−186%
160−170
+186%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−196%
210−220
+196%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Valorant 100−110
−191%
300−310
+191%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Valorant 45−50
−192%
140−150
+192%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

This is how Radeon 840M and Instinct MI60 compete in popular games:

  • Instinct MI60 is 200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.18 27.83
Recency 2 June 2024 18 November 2018
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm

Radeon 840M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Instinct MI60, on the other hand, has a 203.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon Instinct MI60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 840M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 19 votes

Rate Radeon 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 840M or Radeon Instinct MI60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.