Iris Pro Graphics P555 vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1053not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameKrackan PointSkylake GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 June 2024 (1 year ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.768 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2024 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm

Radeon 820M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and Iris Pro Graphics P555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P555 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or Iris Pro Graphics P555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.