Radeon 880M vs Iris Pro Graphics P555

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data92.80
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT3eStrix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors189 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0092.80
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs616
TMUs4832
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

Radeon 880M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P555 and Radeon 880M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P555 is a desktop card while Radeon 880M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.