ATI FirePro V7800P vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameKrackan PointCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)16 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281440
Core clock speed400 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt138 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4050.40
Floating-point processing power0.7168 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872
Ray Tracing Cores2no data
L0 Cache32 KBno data
L1 Cache32 KB144 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.85.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.4N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 138 Watt

Radeon 820M has a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 820% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and FirePro V7800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7800P is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or FirePro V7800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.