ATI FirePro V7800 vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking669not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3+ (2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameKrackan PointCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 June 2024 (1 year ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$759

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281440
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data2.016 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data72
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed7500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2024 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm

Radeon 820M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and FirePro V7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M
ATI FirePro V7800
FirePro V7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate FirePro V7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or FirePro V7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.