ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Radeon 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameKrackan PointR420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMarch 2025 (1 year ago)27 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed2800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.403.400
Floating-point processing power0.7168 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
Ray Tracing Cores2no data
L0 Cache32 KBno data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.4N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 130 nm

Radeon 820M has a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 820M and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 820M is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 820M or All-In-Wonder X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.