Radeon 610M vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated843
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Power efficiencyno data14.12
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR420Dragon Range
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 April 2005 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed425 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.40017.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs88
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2005 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

Radeon 610M has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 SE and Radeon 610M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE
All-In-Wonder X800 SE
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1127 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X800 SE or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.