Radeon RX 5700 XT vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
820M 840M 860M 880M 890M 8040S 8050S 8060S 8065S RX 8040S RX 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Next RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 XT RX 5700 RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8065S with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8065S
2025
44.52
+14.7%

8065S outperforms 5700 XT by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98135
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.12
Power efficiencyno data13.25
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402560
Core clock speedno data1605 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data304.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.754 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8065S 44.52
+14.7%
RX 5700 XT 38.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8065S 18426
+14.7%
Samples: 1
RX 5700 XT 16063
Samples: 17799

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+12%
125
−12%
1440p85−90
+11.8%
76
−11.8%
4K50−55
+6.4%
47
−6.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
−44.6%
347
+44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+35.9%
78
−35.9%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130
−16.9%
145
+16.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+20.2%
119
−20.2%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
−28.3%
308
+28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+35.9%
78
−35.9%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+2.2%
138
−2.2%
Fortnite 190−200
−16.8%
223
+16.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+10.3%
155
−10.3%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
−23.6%
173
+23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−6%
177
+6%
Valorant 250−260
−24.7%
313
+24.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+30%
110
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+35.6%
177
−35.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+41.3%
75
−41.3%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+8.5%
130
−8.5%
Fortnite 190−200
+6.7%
179
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+11%
154
−11%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
−8.6%
152
+8.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
−2.1%
145
+2.1%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+11.3%
97
−11.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0.6%
166
−0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+9.1%
154
−9.1%
Valorant 250−260
−17.1%
294
+17.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+36.2%
105
−36.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+58.2%
67
−58.2%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+27%
111
−27%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+15.5%
148
−15.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+20.1%
139
−20.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+80.6%
93
−80.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+33.6%
143
−33.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+13.3%
105
−13.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+15.8%
270−280
−15.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+20.3%
79
−20.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+17.5%
57
−17.5%
Valorant 280−290
−0.4%
286
+0.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+24.7%
89
−24.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+37.5%
40
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+13.4%
97
−13.4%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+10.9%
119
−10.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+21.6%
70−75
−21.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+30.1%
93
−30.1%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+92.9%
28
−92.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+29.1%
79
−29.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+20%
35
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+37%
54
−37%
Valorant 270−280
+12%
242
−12%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+20%
60
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+17%
53
−17%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+12.7%
79
−12.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+24.5%
53
−24.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+35.6%
45
−35.6%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
High

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%

This is how Radeon 8065S and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S is 12% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8065S is 12% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8065S is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 93% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 45% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S performs better in 42 tests (70%)
  • RX 5700 XT performs better in 11 tests (18%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.52 38.81
Recency 6 January 2025 7 July 2019

Radeon 8065S has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Radeon 8065S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8065S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
HD Graphics 505 Graphics 505
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
HD Graphics 610 Graphics 610
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
RX Vega 10 RX Vega 10
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Plus Graphics 655
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
UHD Graphics 615 Graphics 615
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU Graphics 48EU
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
Apple M4 20-core GPU 20 core GPU
Radeon 8065S AMD Radeon 8065S
vs
Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10292 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.