Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs 8065S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 8065S and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8065S outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 3247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 98 | 1072 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.27 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) |
| GPU code name | no data | Stoney Ridge |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 1 June 2016 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 192 |
| Boost clock speed | 3000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 12-45 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 (FL 12_0) |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 260−270
+3150%
| 8
−3150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+3329%
|
7−8
−3329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 120−130 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+14200%
|
1−2
−14200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+3329%
|
7−8
−3329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+14000%
|
1
−14000%
|
| Fortnite | 190−200
+2629%
|
7
−2629%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+3320%
|
5
−3320%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 140−150
+6900%
|
2−3
−6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+1570%
|
10−11
−1570%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+661%
|
30−35
−661%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+14200%
|
1−2
−14200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+3329%
|
7−8
−3329%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+827%
|
30−33
−827%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+6950%
|
2−3
−6950%
|
| Fortnite | 190−200
+4675%
|
4−5
−4675%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+2038%
|
8−9
−2038%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 140−150
+6900%
|
2−3
−6900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 140−150 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+10700%
|
1
−10700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+1570%
|
10−11
−1570%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+2300%
|
7−8
−2300%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+661%
|
30−35
−661%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 140−150
+14200%
|
1−2
−14200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+6950%
|
2−3
−6950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+2038%
|
8−9
−2038%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+1570%
|
10−11
−1570%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+2300%
|
7−8
−2300%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 190−200
+4675%
|
4−5
−4675%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+2875%
|
4−5
−2875%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 300−350
+3400%
|
9−10
−3400%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
+3250%
|
2−3
−3250%
|
| Valorant | 280−290
+4650%
|
6−7
−4650%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+3600%
|
3−4
−3600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+10900%
|
1−2
−10900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+4300%
|
3−4
−4300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
+4400%
|
2−3
−4400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 120−130
+5950%
|
2−3
−5950%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 100−110
+580%
|
14−16
−580%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 70−75
+3600%
|
2−3
−3600%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+3288%
|
8−9
−3288%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+3500%
|
2−3
−3500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+4350%
|
2−3
−4350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+3200%
|
2−3
−3200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 60−65
+2950%
|
2−3
−2950%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
High
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how Radeon 8065S and R5 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:
- Radeon 8065S is 3150% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 14200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 8065S performs better in 38 tests (88%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (12%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
