Tesla M4 vs Radeon 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency60.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGM206
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)10 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1295 MHz872 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate464.068.61
Floating-point processing power14.85 TFLOPS2.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1024 KB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data88 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 10 November 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 8060S has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M4, on the other hand, has 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and Tesla M4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 194 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Tesla M4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Tesla M4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.