Radeon RX 5300M vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8060S and Radeon RX 5300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8060S
2025
42.03
+266%

8060S outperforms RX 5300M by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.30
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameStrix PointNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2025 (recently)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speed1295 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1445 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rate373.6127.2
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS4.069 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16088
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8060S 42.03
+266%
RX 5300M 11.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8060S 17613
+266%
RX 5300M 4815

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 8060S 40732
+184%
RX 5300M 14351

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 8060S 96996
+147%
RX 5300M 39264

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 8060S 27659
+168%
RX 5300M 10306

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 8060S 164040
+194%
RX 5300M 55837

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+113%
62
−113%
1440p79
+276%
21−24
−276%
4K52
+271%
14−16
−271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+259%
60−65
−259%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+51.1%
92
−51.1%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+236%
60−65
−236%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%
Far Cry 5 106
+179%
35−40
−179%
Fortnite 180−190
+59.6%
114
−59.6%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+226%
50−55
−226%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+458%
35−40
−458%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+286%
40−45
−286%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Valorant 240−250
+130%
100−110
−130%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+75.9%
79
−75.9%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+70.3%
60−65
−70.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+65.5%
160−170
−65.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%
Far Cry 5 104
+174%
35−40
−174%
Fortnite 180−190
+122%
82
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+226%
50−55
−226%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+406%
35−40
−406%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+98.4%
64
−98.4%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+164%
39
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+286%
40−45
−286%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+263%
60
−263%
Valorant 240−250
+130%
100−110
−130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+95.8%
71
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+317%
24−27
−317%
Far Cry 5 97
+155%
35−40
−155%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+226%
50−55
−226%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+286%
40−45
−286%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+200%
38
−200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+214%
58
−214%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+223%
21−24
−223%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+238%
85−90
−238%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+312%
16−18
−312%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+350%
14−16
−350%
Valorant 270−280
+118%
120−130
−118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+242%
30−35
−242%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Far Cry 5 89
+256%
24−27
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+343%
27−30
−343%
Sons of the Forest 65−70
+408%
12−14
−408%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+400%
16−18
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+356%
24−27
−356%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+500%
6−7
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+230%
21−24
−230%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
Valorant 250−260
+308%
60−65
−308%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Far Cry 5 49
+308%
12−14
−308%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+315%
20−22
−315%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+455%
10−12
−455%
Sons of the Forest 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+418%
10−12
−418%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Radeon 8060S and RX 5300M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 113% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 276% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 271% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8060S is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is ahead in 59 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.03 11.49
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm

Radeon 8060S has a 265.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 37 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 97 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon RX 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.