Radeon Graphics 384SP vs 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency58.42no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameStrix HaloCezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1295 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate373.640.80
Floating-point processing power11.96 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16024
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 8060S has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics 384SP, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8060S and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 31 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8060S or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.