Radeon RX 560 vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S with Radeon RX 560, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8050S
2025
55 Watt
37.68
+330%

8050S outperforms RX 560 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129511
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.48
Power efficiency52.198.90
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameStrix HaloPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed1295 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate298.981.60
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12864
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 37.68
+330%
RX 560 8.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8050S 15788
+330%
RX 560 3670

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+209%
35
−209%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
God of War 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+337%
30−33
−337%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 100
+376%
21−24
−376%
Fortnite 160−170
+371%
35−40
−371%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+390%
30−33
−390%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+341%
27−30
−341%
God of War 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+400%
30−33
−400%
Valorant 220−230
+346%
50−55
−346%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+337%
30−33
−337%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+363%
60−65
−363%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 96
+357%
21−24
−357%
Fortnite 160−170
+371%
35−40
−371%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+390%
30−33
−390%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+341%
27−30
−341%
God of War 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+337%
27−30
−337%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+400%
30−33
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+346%
35−40
−346%
Valorant 220−230
+346%
50−55
−346%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+337%
30−33
−337%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 85
+372%
18−20
−372%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+390%
30−33
−390%
God of War 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+400%
30−33
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+338%
21−24
−338%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+371%
35−40
−371%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+342%
60−65
−342%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+381%
16−18
−381%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Valorant 250−260
+364%
55−60
−364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+367%
21−24
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+350%
24−27
−350%
God of War 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Valorant 230−240
+364%
50−55
−364%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
God of War 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%

This is how Radeon 8050S and RX 560 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 209% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.68 8.76
Recency 6 January 2025 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 330.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 3114 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon RX 560, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.