Radeon Pro 5300 vs 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8050S with Radeon Pro 5300, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 8050S
2025
55 Watt
38.09
+124%

8050S outperforms Pro 5300 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency52.7615.24
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameStrix HaloNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1295 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate298.9132.0
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12880
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 8050S 38.09
+124%
Pro 5300 17.00

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 8050S 15960
+124%
Pro 5300 7125

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+138%
40−45
−138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
God of War 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+138%
55−60
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Far Cry 5 100
+150%
40−45
−150%
Fortnite 160−170
+136%
70−75
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+126%
65−70
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
God of War 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+131%
65−70
−131%
Valorant 220−230
+135%
95−100
−135%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+138%
55−60
−138%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+132%
120−130
−132%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Far Cry 5 96
+140%
40−45
−140%
Fortnite 160−170
+136%
70−75
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+126%
65−70
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+140%
50−55
−140%
God of War 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+136%
50−55
−136%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+128%
40−45
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+131%
65−70
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+140%
65−70
−140%
Valorant 220−230
+135%
95−100
−135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+138%
55−60
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Far Cry 5 85
+143%
35−40
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+126%
65−70
−126%
God of War 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+131%
65−70
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+130%
40−45
−130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+136%
70−75
−136%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+141%
110−120
−141%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Valorant 250−260
+132%
110−120
−132%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+130%
40−45
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
God of War 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Valorant 230−240
+132%
100−105
−132%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
God of War 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%

This is how Radeon 8050S and Pro 5300 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8050S is 138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.09 17.00
Recency 6 January 2025 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 85 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 124.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 54.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 8050S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.