Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs Radeon 8050S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency52.61no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameStrix HaloGA10B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1295 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate298.910.00
Floating-point processing power9.564 TFLOPS0.64 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12816
Tensor Coresno data16
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared533 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data34.11 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 10 Watt

Radeon 8050S has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB, on the other hand, has 450% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 8050S and Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8050S or Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.