GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency66.63no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code namePhoenixGB203
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)2026
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128960
Core clock speed800 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17686.6
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Cores870
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache128 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 389 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.