GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs Radeon 760M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency66.72no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePhoenixGB205
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126400
Core clock speed800 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed2599 MHz2512 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate83.17502.4
Floating-point processing power5.323 TFLOPS32.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Cores850
L0 Cache128 KBno data
L1 Cache128 KB6.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared18 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 275 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 760M and GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 379 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 73 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 760M or GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.