GeForce RTX 2080 vs ATI Radeon 7200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1549	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	26.54
Power efficiency	no data	15.49
Architecture	Rage 6 (2000−2007)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	R100	TU104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 April 2000 (24 years ago)	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2944
Core clock speed	166 MHz	1515 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	30 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	1	314.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	10.07 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	6	184
Tensor Cores	no data	368
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	5.312 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x VGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	143
1440p	no data	101
4K	no data	72

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.89
1440p	no data	6.92
4K	no data	9.71

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 April 2000	20 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	180 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	215 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---