RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon 660M

Place in the ranking	563	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	86.45
Power efficiency	11.88	44.58
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Rembrandt+	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2816
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1900 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	13,100 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	45.60	187.4
Floating-point processing power	1.459 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	24	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	6	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 660M 6.89

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.25
+557%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 660M 2647

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17393
+557%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−525%

150−160
+525%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

4.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 −525%	150−160 +525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Counter-Strike 2	17 −547%	110−120 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −550%	65−70 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	42 −543%	270−280 +543%
Forza Horizon 5	30 −533%	190−200 +533%
Metro Exodus	32 −556%	210−220 +556%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −550%	130−140 +550%
Valorant	36 −539%	230−240 +539%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Counter-Strike 2	11 −536%	70−75 +536%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −543%	45−50 +543%
Dota 2	35 −529%	220−230 +529%
Far Cry 5	29 −555%	190−200 +555%
Fortnite	40−45 −534%	260−270 +534%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −536%	210−220 +536%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Grand Theft Auto V	25 −540%	160−170 +540%
Metro Exodus	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −525%	350−400 +525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −550%	130−140 +550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −519%	130−140 +519%
Valorant	19 −532%	120−130 +532%
World of Tanks	100−110 −554%	700−750 +554%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Counter-Strike 2	9 −511%	55−60 +511%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Dota 2	48 −525%	300−310 +525%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −545%	200−210 +545%
Forza Horizon 4	28 −543%	180−190 +543%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −525%	350−400 +525%
Valorant	24−27 −525%	150−160 +525%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −532%	240−250 +532%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
World of Tanks	50−55 −500%	300−310 +500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −545%	200−210 +545%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Valorant	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −550%	130−140 +550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Dota 2	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Fortnite	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Valorant	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%

This is how Radeon 660M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.89	45.25
Recency	3 January 2023	12 February 2024
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt

Radeon 660M has 75% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 556.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.