Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Radeon 660M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.20no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GA10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1500 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6020.00
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432
Tensor Coresno data32
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.29 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 660M has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a desktop card while Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 303 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.