Radeon RX 5700M vs 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.65

RX 5700M outperforms 630 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking719705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.351.57
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed1082 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98247.7
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS7.926 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 630 3.65
RX 5700M 3.85
+5.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1514
RX 5700M 1599
+5.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Valorant 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700M is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700M is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 3.85
Recency 13 May 2019 1 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 180 Watt

Radeon 630 has 260% lower power consumption.

RX 5700M, on the other hand, has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon 630 and Radeon RX 5700M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.