GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.93

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms 630 by a whopping 607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking704204
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.41
Power efficiency5.4227.39
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed1082 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98105.8
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3272
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.93
RTX 3050 6 GB 27.80
+607%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1512
RTX 3050 6 GB 10684
+607%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Valorant 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Fortnite 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−606%
240−250
+606%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Valorant 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
World of Tanks 65−70
−572%
450−500
+572%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−606%
240−250
+606%
Valorant 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−604%
190−200
+604%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
World of Tanks 27−30
−579%
190−200
+579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−577%
210−220
+577%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Valorant 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Dota 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Fortnite 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Valorant 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.93 27.80
Recency 13 May 2019 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 630 has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 607.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1477 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.