GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Radeon 625

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 625 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 625
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.66

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms 625 by a whopping 1203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8421.76
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 24TU104B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed730 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58220.8
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−1222%
119
+1222%
1440p5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
4K3−4
−1400%
45
+1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2643%
190−200
+2643%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1975%
166
+1975%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2643%
190−200
+2643%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
Fortnite 12−14
−1162%
164
+1162%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−908%
130−140
+908%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1667%
100−110
+1667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−938%
130−140
+938%
Valorant 40−45
−368%
200−210
+368%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1800%
152
+1800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2643%
190−200
+2643%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−456%
270−280
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
Dota 2 24−27
−400%
130
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1457%
100−110
+1457%
Fortnite 12−14
−1100%
156
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−908%
130−140
+908%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1667%
100−110
+1667%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1743%
129
+1743%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1640%
87
+1640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−938%
130−140
+938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1711%
163
+1711%
Valorant 40−45
−368%
200−210
+368%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1663%
141
+1663%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−2071%
150−160
+2071%
Dota 2 24−27
−377%
124
+377%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1400%
105
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−908%
130−140
+908%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−938%
130−140
+938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−867%
87
+867%
Valorant 40−45
−270%
163
+270%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−892%
129
+892%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1132%
230−240
+1132%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3200%
65−70
+3200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5300%
54
+5300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−821%
170−180
+821%
Valorant 24−27
−900%
240−250
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Dead Island 2 6−7
−1050%
65−70
+1050%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1760%
93
+1760%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Valorant 12−14
−1477%
200−210
+1477%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
Dota 2 7−8
−1343%
100−110
+1343%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Radeon 625 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1222% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1460% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is ahead in 60 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 34.66
Recency 13 May 2019 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

Radeon 625 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1203% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 149 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 402 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 625 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.