RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 620 with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 620
2019
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
2.16

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 620 by a whopping 3043% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.4878.13
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 24GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848960
Core clock speed730 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate24.58374.4
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache96 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 620 2.16
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+3043%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 620 955
Samples: 25
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+3043%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Fortnite 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Valorant 40−45
−2995%
1300−1350
+2995%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−2943%
1400−1450
+2943%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Dota 2 24−27
−3025%
750−800
+3025%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Fortnite 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%
Valorant 40−45
−2995%
1300−1350
+2995%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Dota 2 24−27
−3025%
750−800
+3025%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%
Valorant 40−45
−2995%
1300−1350
+2995%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−2841%
500−550
+2841%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−2995%
650−700
+2995%
Valorant 18−20
−2795%
550−600
+2795%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−3025%
500−550
+3025%
Valorant 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 67.89
Recency 13 May 2019 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 620 has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 3043.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 620 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 68 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 620 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.