Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 620
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 620 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 620 by a whopping 985% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 879 | 241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.45 | 53.51 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 24 | AD107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 May 2019 (6 years ago) | 26 February 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 2025 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 | 129.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−971%
|
75−80
+971%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Fortnite | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−876%
|
400−450
+876%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−971%
|
75−80
+971%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−900%
|
450−500
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−983%
|
260−270
+983%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Fortnite | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−956%
|
95−100
+956%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−876%
|
400−450
+876%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−971%
|
75−80
+971%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−983%
|
260−270
+983%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−983%
|
130−140
+983%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−956%
|
95−100
+956%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−876%
|
400−450
+876%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−963%
|
170−180
+963%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−945%
|
230−240
+945%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
−953%
|
200−210
+953%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−967%
|
160−170
+967%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
−900%
|
110−120
+900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 6−7
−983%
|
65−70
+983%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−900%
|
30−33
+900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.27 | 24.62 |
| Recency | 13 May 2019 | 26 February 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 984.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon 620 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
