GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon 620

Place in performance ranking	850	270
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	N18P-G62
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2019 (5 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Core clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	24.58	95.04
Floating-point performance	0.7864 gflops	3.041 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 620 2.33

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+767%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 620 897

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+769%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 620 1730

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+474%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −867%	58 +867%
1440p	4−5 −975%	43 +975%
4K	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−1080%

59
+1080%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −663%	61 +663%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −2100%	65−70 +2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −783%	53 +783%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1625%	69 +1625%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1300%	84 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1027%	120−130 +1027%
Hitman 3	7−8 −629%	51 +629%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −853%	181 +853%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −9000%	91 +9000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −780%	44 +780%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −509%	65−70 +509%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −443%	201 +443%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −2100%	65−70 +2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −683%	47 +683%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −620%	36 +620%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1350%	58 +1350%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −883%	59 +883%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1027%	120−130 +1027%
Hitman 3	7−8 −614%	50 +614%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −847%	180 +847%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −7800%	79 +7800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −582%	75 +582%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −395%	183 +395%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −238%	27 +238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −417%	31 +417%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −580%	34 +580%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1027%	120−130 +1027%
Hitman 3	7−8 −514%	43 +514%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −237%	64 +237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −473%	63 +473%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −200%	39 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +68.2%	22 −68.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−720%

41
+720%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −875%	35−40 +875%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1167%	38 +1167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −767%	26 +767%
Hitman 3	7−8 −300%	28 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −823%	120 +823%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−560%

30−35
+560%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	20−22
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−500%

18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	16 +0%	16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how Radeon 620 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 867% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 975% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 620 is 68% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 9000% faster.

All in all, in popular games: