Quadro RTX 8200 vs Radeon 550X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.41no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLexaGA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 March 2019 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127552
Core clock speed1082 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98708.0
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32472
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 260 Watt

Radeon 550X has 420% lower power consumption.

RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 550X and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 550X is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 550X
Radeon 550X
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 550X or Quadro RTX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.