H3C XG310 vs Radeon 540X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking752not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameLexaDG1
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2018 (7 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768 ×4
Core clock speed980 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4752.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.071 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1624 ×4
TMUs3248 ×4
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2018 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

Radeon 540X has 500% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540X and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540X is a notebook graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540X
Radeon 540X
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 330 votes

Rate Radeon 540X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540X or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.