ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs 550X Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code namePolaris 23R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 April 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate51.483.040
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs408
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

550X Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 550X Mobile and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 550X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Radeon 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 550X Mobile or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.